Posted tagged ‘HTML’

The horror of HTML (where it isn’t wanted)

March 30, 2010

I may need to give up on this; but not without a little noise.

Every day I receive some, let us say, 100 emails that are HTML-formatted. Some of these are really just text emails written by people who don’t know any better, or who have left intact the default formatting options of their email clients. Some are from people who think it’s really cool to add little formatting touches to their emails. Some are advertisements from companies that chuck in formatting, photos, even flash stuff.

So here is my plea to the world: Email is a text only communication device. HTML, or indeed any form of formatting or multimedia, is out of place here. Adding it takes away lots and lots of disk space and adds the risk of virus infection. So for heaven’s sake, send your emails unformatted, text only. Please.

Please, no HTML!

December 1, 2008

For the first time ever (I think), on one day during the past week every email I received was coded in HTML. For those who don’t know what that is (and I’m sure there won’t be many), HTML is Hyper-Text-Markup-Language, and in short it’s the code that produces the formatting for web pages or other hypertext documents. It allows the author to introduce font formatting, font and background colour, bold and italics, images, and so forth. These are of course all things that we expect to see on a website.

Over the past few years, however, it has become more and more common for emails also to be written and received in this way. The original concept behind email was to have everything in text only – i.e. in ASCII characters without any formatting, images or the like. This meant that there was maximum compatibility between people and email clients (programs), and email messages would be small in terms of bytes. But then, perhaps in the desire to differentiate different email clients, users were offered formatting opportunities, and these were implemented through HTML. Emails got bigger (not in terms of words, but in terms of file size) and more complex, and there was always a slight fear that they would be more easily used as carriers of viruses once they were more than just text. Furthermore, the most prolific users of HTML in emails tended to be spammers.

Maybe I’m being unrealistic, but I don’t like formatted emails, and my email client (Mulberry, which by the way is the best there is) has been set by me to reject all HTML and other formatting in emails. If you send me a formatted email, then if that is possible my program will present me with the text only, stripping out all formatting before I open it; and if it cannot do that, it may just present me with a blank email the latter tends to happen in particular with emails from Apple, oddly enough). Just very occasionally I reformat it manually to HTML or whatever if I feel I need to be able to see the email as written. And when I do that, I mutter under my breath about the sender.

Why am I so pedantic? For me, email is a communication and information tool, and I just don’t want to be distracted by fancy formatting; I want to minimise the risk of emails being carriers for stuff I don’t want; I keep every email ever sent to me, and I want to avoid it taking up unnecessary space (the HTML version of an email typically is three times as big as the text-only version); and because email was never supposed to be formatted, and I am holding out for that original purity.

So there it is. If you are sending me emails, do send them text-only; your formatting does not impress me. I shall be very grateful!