Protecting an educational ethos?

In 1985 in Ireland a female schoolteacher was dismissed by the secondary school employing her when she became pregnant. She challenged the lawfulness of the dismissal, and the case was heard in the Employment Appeals Tribunal, and on appeal in the Circuit Court and, finally, the High Court. The teacher’s case was that she had been dismissed on grounds of pregnancy, a ground for dismissal expressly prohibited under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977. The school in question was a Catholic convent school, and it argued in its defence that she had not been dismissed because she was pregnant, but because her pregnancy was a visible rejection by her of the ethos of the school, as she was living with a man to whom she was not married. The school won its case at all stages, with the various tribunal members and judges stating that it was entitled to protect its particular ethos, and that the teacher had demonstrated visibly that she was rejecting it. In fact in an extraordinary aside the Circuit Court judge hearing the case pointed out in his judgement that ‘in other places women are being condemned to death for this sort of offence’ (Flynn v. Power and Sisters of the Holy Faith).

So is all this kind of thing different today? Well, last month a Roman Catholic institution in Philadelphia, Chestnut Hill College, fired one of its lecturers, a priest, after the local diocese received a complaint about the priest because he was gay. It is in fact a complex case, because when they discovered that he was gay they also discovered that he was not a Roman Catholic priest, but rather a priest of the Old Catholic church (which split from Rome in the 19th century and is now aligned with the Anglican church). The college has defended its actions by pointing out that same-sex partnerships are ‘contrary to the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church’.

In these islands there are many denominational schools and institutions, and these cases raise the question of whether they should be allowed to protect their ethos even when this means disciplining or dismissing staff whose actions violate the denomination’s moral code but are protected by law. It is unlawful to fire someone because of their sexual orientation: but should there be an exception to this where the employer maintains religious objections to homosexuality? This may become even more significant when colleges with a denominational ethos are the only providers of certain kinds of programmes.

I am not arguing the case against religious institutions (though I think the near-monopoly of denominational education at primary level needs to be revisited urgently) – indeed DCU has three affiliated denominational colleges of which I was always very proud. But I do not believe that it should be lawful to protect an ethos where elements of that ethos actually violate the law of the land. It is, I think, to maintain a moral perspective opposing certain types of sexual conduct, but where such conduct is protected by law, the law cannot (or should not) be trumped by private morality.

Explore posts in the same categories: ethics, higher education, society

Tags: ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

5 Comments on “Protecting an educational ethos?”

  1. Mark Dowling Says:

    Well, since you brought up denominated colleges – when do you reckon it’ll be possible to train as a primary teacher in this country without being obliged to take a religion course?

  2. Vincent Says:

    Does that bit of case law still stand or has it been struck out since.

    What you should add is that there was a series of happenings that might be described as a systematic attempt to prevent any progress at that time. But events prevented people from being bamboozled back into a form of Christian compliance. You know the type that allowed scumbags to destroy the lives of those that they felt might be a threat in the future while they were children.
    The attempt to prevent a Roe v Wade scenario, Kerry babies, where a woman was railroaded. This. And worst of all the child and her child that died under a motte in Granard see;

  3. Vincent Says:

    Oh, are the English FA operating a form of Canon laws. I didn’t realise that shooting -with whatever- was an internal disciplinary matter to the FA. I’d have thought that was a matter decided by a Red Judge.

  4. […] as I was posting the blog a particularly animated discussion was starting on 'universitydiary' ( on the matter.   There is only one problem with the discussion – there was […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: