Punishing promotion

One of the undoubtedly maddest measures affecting higher education taken by the Irish government in recent years has been the ‘Employment Control Framework’, mentioned on several occasions in this blog. This Orwellian sounding regulation, imposed as part of the recent cost-cutting drive in the public service, sets out to reduce staffing in higher education institutions, restrict the capacity of universities and colleges to appoint staff to vacant posts and prohibit them from promoting anyone within the system – even where institutions have already met salary cost reduction targets.  It has in this way put an end to career development within higher education.

Trinity College Dublin decided to deal with this situation by promoting 27 members of staff last year, but delaying the associated salary increases until January 2011, the date on which the ‘Employment Control Framework’ formally ceased to have effect. It has now been reported that the Higher Education Authority intends to impose ‘massive fines’ on TCD, so as to protect the exchequer ‘from any unauthorised costs’.

There are several things wrong with this. First, there have been no ‘unauthorised costs’, nor could there be. Under the Irish legal framework, no individual costs incurred by any university have to be ‘authorised’ by anyone, except where salaries are paid outside of the normal public service pay scales (which does not apply here, as all the promoted academics will continue to be paid on those scales). Secondly, TCD has (like all the universities) applied the salary cost reduction targets imposed by the government; in other words, the pay costs in the College are precisely in line with what the government required. Thirdly, the steps taken by TCD did not break the ‘Employment Control Framework’, which came to an end in December 2010. Finally, it is outside the HEA’s statutory powers to apply fines, for this or any other reason.

Career development is vital for morale and productivity in this beleaguered sector, and to remove it altogether makes no sense, when staff costs are being reduced by the institutions as required. But beyond that, it is unacceptable for the institutions of the state to seek to punish universities with penalties that lie outside their jurisdiction.

It is to be hoped that the HEA re-thinks its position in this matter.

Explore posts in the same categories: higher education, university

Tags: , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

3 Comments on “Punishing promotion”

  1. Jilly Says:

    The HEA needs to be reigned in and reminded of its proper function. According to its own website, this is:

    The Mission Statement of the HEA is “To foster the development of a higher education sector which is accessible to all potential students and which is recognised internationally for the high quality of teaching, learning and research and which has the capacity to address the changing needs and challenges in our society”.

    The Principal Functions of the HEA are

    * To further the development of higher education.
    * To maintain a continuous review of the demand and need for higher education.
    * To assist in the coordination of state investment in higher education and to prepare proposals for such investment.
    * To allocate among universities, institutes of technology and the designated institutions the grants voted by the Oireachtas.
    * To promote the attainment of equality of opportunity in higher education and democratisation of higher education.

    Under the current administration of the HEA, it appears to have entirely forgotten the correct relationship between it and the universities, and instead has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Departments of Education and Finance.

  2. Jacco Says:

    Well, it seems I made the right decision to leave TCD this summer. The points are well made and important. The department I was in (economics) has been deliberately recruiting overseas in recent years for junior posts and has been very successful. There are now several very promising young research-active lecturers in that department. But this kind of policy is not going to keep them there; they are eminently employable elsewhere.

  3. cormac Says:

    I agree, but I also suspect the title/recognition is more important to most academics than the salary; it would be interesting to know whether the new profs would be willing to forgo pay increases even after 2011.(I would). Perhaps honorary professorships have a role to play in the future if the country is truly broke…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: