Elections and the search for a political brand

Like many people in Ireland, I spent yesterday evening observing the outcome of the Fianna Fáil leadership election and watching the new leader, Micheál Martin, give his first press conference. The obvious question to ask at this point is whether his arrival in this position will make a difference to his party’s fortunes. Of course we don’t know, but here are some observations.

First, if you believe that Twitter in any sense reflects directions and shifts in popular opinion, then he is already making a difference. Until yesterday and over the past few weeks, the Twitter world was wholly hostile to Fianna Fáil; the tone in tweets on the party was dismissive, angry, sarcastic. It hasn’t all changed overnight, but yesterday evening the trend was more balanced. If Twitter sometimes sets a tone (as it did for Joan Burton, as covered here the day before), then the tone for Martin might give his party some slight occasion for hope, or at least less fatalism.

Secondly, the tone of his own statements was markedly different from that of his predecessor. Gone was the hostility towards ‘the media’ (which I always thought was a very unwise approach for Brian Cowen to take), gone was the somewhat grumpy aggression, in came a kind of engaging willingness to accept some blame and look forward with optimism.

But it’s very early days, and for now we don’t really yet know what the Micheál Martin ‘brand’ might be – though we shall need to find out quickly if it is to make any difference. In the end, effective politics is all about finding a brand that resonates with the public. American political analysts tend to suggest that political success is based on identifying the correct issues and associating them with popular values. The issues in Ireland right now are easy enough to identify – they are all about economics and the associated social consequences. But what are the values? And how will the values of one party be capable of differentiation from those of another? And how easy will it be to communicate the resulting brands?

It is part of political leadership to communicate this, and Brian Cowen failed because he couldn’t. I would still have serious doubts as to whether Enda Kenny, once placed into the political crossfire of the election campaign, has what it takes either.

However, the odds must still be that the election will produce a decisive outcome that propels us towards a Fine Gael/Labour coalition. It is still almost inevitable that Fianna Fáil will spend the next four or five years in opposition. For what it’s worth, I don’t think that Sinn Féin or the independents will do as well as some are predicting.

But I don’t think that all this is totally inevitable, or that the precise outcome is predetermined. And that makes it more interesting.

PS. Here is my favourite tweet on yesterday’s events in Fianna Fáil, which I think sums up the position perfectly:

‘Anagrams of Micheal Martin (sans fada): “Miracle Man Hit” Or “Am the Criminal” It could go either way!!’

Explore posts in the same categories: politics

Tags: , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

3 Comments on “Elections and the search for a political brand”

  1. Anna Notaro Says:

    “In the end, effective politics is all about finding a brand that resonates with the public.” This might be true, but I’d very much like to replace the word ‘all’ above with ‘also’, I’m just a bit wary of the fact that we are increasingly seeing product parity in the political arena just as in the consumer goods arena. what’s worrying is that policy is converging and the key differences between the major political parties in much of the western world are attitudinal, rather than substantial. The following is an interesting study of New Labour and Branding

  2. Colum McCaffery Says:

    I’ve been trying to find fame by getting credit for adding a new word to the dictionary: “WAWWA”.

    It’s meaning emerges most easily when one considers the abandonment off all common sense and “going wawwa”, i.e. disregarding past behaviour and actions in making assessments of present worth and future performance.

    WAWWA is based on a bizarre approach to life offered by both FF and SF: “We Are Where We Are” or “Whatever else you do, don’t look at our record.”

    I dislike the notion of branding and the confusion of politics with marketing. Call me old fashioned but I rely on argument. However, before right can clash with left, before ideologies can be mentioned, before any form of argument, the question of stupidity must be addressed.

    Unless a person seeking elected office or attempting to hold on to a job which pays him or her to think and speak, can show some evidence of having opposed the extraordinarily and obviously silly policies which created the Irish property bubble, they should be retired.
    http://colummccaffery.wordpress.com/2010/11/24/time-for-a-clear-out-who-misled-and-who-remained-silent-as-a-completely-irish-made-fiasco-developed/

  3. Mark Dowling Says:

    Martin has been a senior consigliere for years. He shares collective responsibility for this disaster. He should pledge to reboot FF as a political party with a return to policy at Ard Fheiseanna and then retire half way through the next Dail to make way for someone from the next generation without the taint of Cabinet in the last decade.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: