Getting to grips with history

What strong opinion did Winston Churchill and Adolf Hitler have in common? They both emphatically disapproved of the Versailles Treaty, which set out peace terms after the end of the First World War.

Negotiations for the Treaty began 92 years ago in January 1919, and it was eventually signed on June 28, 1919. Under its provisions Germany had to accept sole responsibility for the War; it lost substantial territory in both the West and the East, had restrictions imposed on its armed forces, and was obliged to pay compensation (‘reparations’); the latter amounted to 132 billion Marks (over €300 billion in today’s money), and the final payment was not made until September 2010.

The Versailles Treaty continues to determine the borders of what we might call Western Europe; the East was set by the Potsdam Treaty after World War 2, and by the post-Communist re-arrangements after 1989. But beyond that, Versailles is the basis, good and bad, for what became of Europe. It became the issue on which Hitler built his career, and in turn the actions of the ‘Third Reich’ and their consequences determined pretty much everything that followed. Indeed if, as some argue, Europe is in terminal decline, Versailles is possibly also connected with that.

Versailles clearly did not excuse the terrible things Hitler did, but did it create the conditions whereby he was able to do them? This issue is still debated by historians, and there are two schools of thought: those who argue that the Treaty’s excessively harsh and unreasonable terms set up the disasters that were to follow; and those who believe that the Treaty’s terms were rather mild and could, if anything, be faulted in that they didn’t dismantle German power enough. And then, did Germany alone cause the First World War? Or could it be said that all the original combatants were equally responsible?

Whatever version of history may be right, it seems to me to be clear that the Treaty of Versailles is one of the most important documents of recent European history, and I am regularly amazed at how few people know anything at all about it. Maybe it is felt that the European Union put an end to the tensions and currents that made Versailles significant. But as the European project comes under stress, it may be important for us to understand how we all got here, and what dangers and risks are out there should everything fall apart. It is time for Versailles to get a little more attention.

Explore posts in the same categories: history

Tags: ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

One Comment on “Getting to grips with history”

  1. Vincent Says:

    You have to remember that the Treaty is viewed as one in each and every Country.
    However the effects leastwise the economic effects on Germany as used by the Nazi are at best moody. Certainly it would seem that the reparations were the problem. But the reality is it was the War Economy itself between ’14 to ’18. Also remember she was for most of this time fighting on two fronts. Some would say ten. But either way she managed to produce enough to feed and arm a large proportion of her population. And for far longer than most would have thought possible. Such that on the return of her armies they were largely unemployed.
    Mostly, Versailles is little more than a place to hang a hat. And as to the truncation of those central powers. Yugoslavia was the only one they got profoundly wrong and that because of Whitehall doing a solo run on the issue.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: