Student contributions in Scotland? Perhaps, perhaps not

Scotland’s Education Secretary Mike Russell appeared on Wednesday of this week before the Scottish Parliament’s Education, Lifelong Learning and Culture Committee and gave very full answers to questions put to him by Committee members. Given the somewhat uncertain position right now for Scotland’s universities there is bound to be strong interest in what he said, and whether his answers might give any clues as to future funding policies.

The following passages in his answers probably sum up his evidence before the Committee quite effectively:

‘I believe that the state has the primary responsibility for education in Scotland. Therefore, I do not automatically accept that there should be a graduate contribution. However, I want to consider the matter in the round, taking account of all the issues. As you will know if you have been following what I have said on the matter, the argument is not just about students paying money. The first question that we should ask ourselves in Scotland is this: what is higher education for? Why is the state investing in it? What is it going to produce? A debate that is predicated only on the question of how much students should pay is not a debate. There are, for example, issues of accelerated entry, of how the baccalaureate fits in and of whether universities’ work overseas produces a balance of funding. A range of such issues must be considered. I do not automatically accept that Scotland should have a system of graduate contributions…

I have a more general and important point to make. Higher education is a vital part of our national life and I will not rush into a decision about funding patterns without listening very carefully to all the arguments. I have shown myself to have an open mind. I believe that I have shown leadership in ensuring that the debate has started, has progressed, has a form and will come to a conclusion. I have guaranteed that to the sector.’

The Cabinet Secretary clearly is not in favour of tuition fees, but is not ruling out fees or graduate contributions entirely. Usefully, his comments show a willingness to look at the broader pedagogical and policy issues of higher education. In these very difficult times, there should be an interesting debate ahead.

Explore posts in the same categories: higher education, politics

Tags: , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

3 Comments on “Student contributions in Scotland? Perhaps, perhaps not”

  1. Vincent Says:

    The Cabinet Secretary ??. The head of the Westminster civil servise. What’s he got to do with the price of eggs in Scotland these days and on this subject.

    • iainmacl Says:

      Vincent…you’ve misunderstood. Ministers in the Scottish Government are called ‘Cabinet Secretary for…’ just a bit of specialist nomenclature.

      As for the powers that they have copernicus, to an extent you are right, that’s why the current governing party is advocating independence or at the very least ‘fiscal autonomy’ so that the scottish government can be responsible for the entire budget and, if appropriate, transfer funds to westminster for joint activities, rather than simply receiving a block grant based on the Barnett formula and have whole areas of economic and social activity retained by Westminster. The constraints imposed by the current devolutionary arrangements are unsustainable and indeed all parties agree with that, just that they differ as to what should be done.

      Having the freedom to decide whether to allocate billions of tax revenue to education or to a share in nuclear weapons for example would provide quite an amount of latitude!

  2. copernicus Says:

    Ferdinand,
    The Scotland is given a pot of money which they can use whichever way they want to. There are cuts coming, and if they want to keep the “free university” thing, something has to be cut. Or they can use their 3% tax raising power and I wonder how much it will raise. As simple as that. One can have as much pipedream as possible and this minister in Scotland is no more powerful than my local councillor in charge of education in my borough, who also gets a pot of money from the central government.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: