<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The economic impact of public investment in research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://universitydiary.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/the-economic-impact-of-public-investment-in-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://universitydiary.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/the-economic-impact-of-public-investment-in-research/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfryar</title>
		<link>http://universitydiary.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/the-economic-impact-of-public-investment-in-research/#comment-17401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jfryar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universitydiary.wordpress.com/?p=4908#comment-17401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would argue that if we&#039;re making a profit on the cash injected into third-level research, then we&#039;re probably not being ambitious enough.

Surely the point of research at third-level is to allow people to investigate interesting science that may or may not have a commerical or economic benefit. After all, if you don&#039;t do the research, how will you know?

The private sector performs research to achieve short-term goals. If we now insist that universities also only conduct research that has an economic impact in the short-term and can be justified on financial terms to the taxpayer then who is going to conduct the &#039;maybe it will work, maybe it won&#039;t, but we don&#039;t know yet&#039; research to drive future developments? In which case why bother conducting research at universities - just get the lecturers to teach.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would argue that if we&#8217;re making a profit on the cash injected into third-level research, then we&#8217;re probably not being ambitious enough.</p>
<p>Surely the point of research at third-level is to allow people to investigate interesting science that may or may not have a commerical or economic benefit. After all, if you don&#8217;t do the research, how will you know?</p>
<p>The private sector performs research to achieve short-term goals. If we now insist that universities also only conduct research that has an economic impact in the short-term and can be justified on financial terms to the taxpayer then who is going to conduct the &#8216;maybe it will work, maybe it won&#8217;t, but we don&#8217;t know yet&#8217; research to drive future developments? In which case why bother conducting research at universities &#8211; just get the lecturers to teach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://universitydiary.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/the-economic-impact-of-public-investment-in-research/#comment-17388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universitydiary.wordpress.com/?p=4908#comment-17388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2011/09/27/the-impact-of-the-prtli/#comments]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2011/09/27/the-impact-of-the-prtli/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2011/09/27/the-impact-of-the-prtli/#comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: universitydiary</title>
		<link>http://universitydiary.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/the-economic-impact-of-public-investment-in-research/#comment-17379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[universitydiary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universitydiary.wordpress.com/?p=4908#comment-17379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, that&#039;s the future gain. You have to add the €753 already achieved.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, that&#8217;s the future gain. You have to add the €753 already achieved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall</title>
		<link>http://universitydiary.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/the-economic-impact-of-public-investment-in-research/#comment-17378</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universitydiary.wordpress.com/?p=4908#comment-17378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe it&#039;s my maths but it looks like it&#039;s worth less to the economy than the money invested. Invested = €1.173 billion. Estimated gain over 5 years €1.108 billion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s my maths but it looks like it&#8217;s worth less to the economy than the money invested. Invested = €1.173 billion. Estimated gain over 5 years €1.108 billion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bethduff</title>
		<link>http://universitydiary.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/the-economic-impact-of-public-investment-in-research/#comment-17376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bethduff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universitydiary.wordpress.com/?p=4908#comment-17376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the general public would have much higher regard for research if they could understand it more easily - and thus understand the benefits, even the indirect ones. Much &quot;academic writing&quot; is the equivalent of Latin in past centuries, limiting knowledge to the few who can understand it. Of course, academic writing  needs structure and rigour - but it can also tell exciting stories that would increase public engagement and interest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the general public would have much higher regard for research if they could understand it more easily &#8211; and thus understand the benefits, even the indirect ones. Much &#8220;academic writing&#8221; is the equivalent of Latin in past centuries, limiting knowledge to the few who can understand it. Of course, academic writing  needs structure and rigour &#8211; but it can also tell exciting stories that would increase public engagement and interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://universitydiary.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/the-economic-impact-of-public-investment-in-research/#comment-17368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vincent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 04:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universitydiary.wordpress.com/?p=4908#comment-17368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well they would say that now would they not. You cannot really expect them to come out and say that the whole thing is an expensive vanity project.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well they would say that now would they not. You cannot really expect them to come out and say that the whole thing is an expensive vanity project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
