The curious case of the leaked emails and climate change research
Perhaps you have never heard of Professor Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia. However, he has become quite a celebrity, though in an unusual way. Depending on what you read, and depending on whom you believe, he is either an academic villain who has willingly been a participant in the falsification of research data on climate change; or he is a victim in a tale of conspiracy and theft, the kind of tale you’ll shortly see recounted in a Hollywood blockbuster with Tom Hanks in the starring role.
Let’s take these aspects separately. Phil Jones is Director of the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia; or at least he sort of is, having just temporarily stepped down from this role for reasons we’ll get to in a moment. This unit has a world class reputation, and its work has been used by governments and others in the development of a global policy on climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. But we know even more than that about him. Recently emails written and received by him over a period of several years appear to have been hacked, and some of them have been published by a blog specialising in arguments that question the validity of assumptions on man-made climate change, the Air Vent. The leaked emails appear to show – or at least that’s the construction put on them by the blog in question – that Professor Jones and his global academic collaborators have edited or manipulated data and information in order to avoid subjecting received wisdom on climate change to critical scrutiny. Now an inquiry has been set up by the university to investigate all this, and pending the outcome Professor Jones has stepped down from the post of Director of the unit.
So what about the mystery story? Well, it contains a number of dramatic elements: the theft of email; their appearance on a climate-change-sceptical website; sudden howls of indignation from those who feel that Professor Jones and his colleagues are academic vagabonds and knaves (including this editorial in the Times newspaper); the impact of all this on the Copenhagen Climate Summit, which is about to open and which will be held in the presence of world leaders, including President Obama. No doubt there are also secret agents and spies and femmes fatales somewhere or other in this story, if only we could see into the shadowy corners.
What are we to make of it all? Some are suggesting these emails demonstrate that the whole body of wisdom on what we must learn to call anthropogenic climate change (i.e. man-made – at least we’ve all been able to learn a new word from this saga) is just a lot of falsified data and uncorroborated assumptions. Others are saying that the way in which the emails were stolen and then selectively (and with tendentious editing) released shows that dark forces were at work, and that therefore they demonstrate that all of this body of work is true. Others again are saying that all this is a sideshow and an unwelcome distraction.
I confess that I do find it all very suspicious, and that when information is released based on stolen documents I tend to smell a rat. Nevertheless, all of this has had the impact of a squid spraying ink into our faces, and it will be important for the academic community working on climate change to communicate with the wider world of decision and policy-makers to reassure them of the integrity of the body of work on which the global community has been relying. The initial response of those whose emails had been released to refuse to comment was perhaps not the wisest course of action.
In the meantime, and unrelated to the specific academic area, we are reminded again that emails are not secure communications. I was once advised never to put in an email what I did not want my mother to read or what I did not want to see reproduced on the front page of a national newspaper. Good advice.
Explore posts in the same categories: science, universityTags: climate change, Copenhagen Climate Summit, Phil Jones, research, University of East Anglia
You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.
December 4, 2009 at 8:48 am
Actually I learnt two new words. The second being tendentious (expressing or intending to promote a particular cause or point of view).
Nice!
December 6, 2009 at 9:07 pm
I think you have it right – if someone can hack into one’s email, they can also edit the messages…as we can never know whether this was done the result is completely unreliable as evidence
December 8, 2009 at 3:43 pm
Dear Ferdinand,
I read your article on the leaked emails with interest.
I am sad to say the situation is a whole lot worse than you feared.
The emails show that these IPCC scientists should not be trusted but also show:
- Harassment of skeptic scientists
- Illegally deleting information to avoid it coming into the public domain
- Colluding to defeat Freedom of Information requests
- Attempting to keep certain papers out of the IPCC report and
- Attempting to hijack the peer review process.
If the above was not bad enough we have the computer code which clearly shows the data manipulated to produce the desired outcome.
There is an excellent unbiased article below for your reference: http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2009/12/01/climategate_and_scientific_conduct.php
Perhaps we should listen to the words of the leading climate scientist at the UEA who has concluded that the IPCC has “run it’s course” – Mike Hulme.
I firmly believe the IPCC should be dismantled, the science decoupled from politics and a new independent body setup staffed by credible scientists with transparent data.
The arrogance of this ‘movement’ was highlighted this week with reports that record numbers of gas guzzling Limos are being drafted in to ferry the delegates around Copenhagen along with 140 extra private jets which will not be able to park at the airport and will have to fly back to neighbouring airports – against a backdrop of condescending speeches on lowering our carbon footprint, hiking taxes on air fares and “playing our part”.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6736517/Copenhagen-climate-summit-1200-limos-140-private-planes-and-caviar-wedges.html
Our very way of life is under threat from these climate change alarmists. If their proposals go through we will be forced to pay a tax on the very substance we breathe – CO2, our already shattered economy will be put under immense pressure. Obama is preparing to declare CO2 a “dangerous pollutant” via the EPA this week.
I urge you and your readers to take a closer look into this scam and make an informed decision.