Action days
Today, as certainly all Irish readers of this blog will know, has been a day of strike action organised by Irish public service trade unions in protest at cuts in funding for public services, expected salary reductions and reductions in staffing. As a result more or less all of Ireland’s public and civil service offices and institutions were shut down, from government offices to schools. Most universities and colleges were also shut, with the exception of DCU and the University of Limerick, where staff voted not to join in the national strike action.
It was impossible to travel anywhere around Dublin today without seeing groups of people picketing workplaces. Some were low key, but many were very active. As I passed Trinity College’s various entrances by car, for example, it seemed to me that there were very large numbers on picket lines, so that access (even if the gates had been open) would have been difficult, and would certainly have required strong nerves.
And even before the day was over, it was announced by the trade unions that another such day was being planned for December 3.
The day of action, and the seemingly strong participation in it, arose from a feeling amongst public servants that they are the victims of mismanagement by others; that government, banks and business leaders behaved recklessly and lost large sums of money, and that those responsible are being protected or cushioned from the consequences and that public sector employees were being asked to pay for all this. Others also believe that the poor are being targeted while the wealthy are protected. A very significant number of posters being carried on picket lines today demanded that the rich should be taxed more in order to resolve the national economic problems.
No doubt the anger, fear and resentment are understandable, and perhaps the day of action provides an opportunity to let off steam and allow people to express their frustrations. Whether the assessment of our problems on which at any rate the picket line posters are based is accurate is rather another matter. According to the Minister for Finance, Brian Lenihan TD, 4 per cent of Irish taxpayers provide almost half of all income tax receipts, while half of the country’s income earners pay no income tax at all. As for the public services, the claim now is that pay levels for public servants are substantially above what is earned by public servants in other comparable countries and also above what is earned by those in the private sector in Ireland; indeed the claim is that this was the case even before substantial increases were applied earlier this decade through the process of benchmarking. At two picket lines today I saw members of the public expressing their anger at the picketers in fairly colourful terms.
Obviously, tempers are hot, and there is a sense that the work being done by public servants is not appreciated – and so it seems to me that a process of reassuring them that this is not so is a step that needs to be taken. A situation where both media comment and political actions seem to be suggesting constantly that public servants are exploiting national resources for selfish ends has not been helpful. On the other hand, it is not likely that actions such as today’s will strengthen the position of public servants, at least not if the rest of society withhold their backing and sympathy. The potential of strikes is that they will alienate the general public rather than encourage them to feel solidarity.
This may be a good time for all sides to think again about their tactics.
Explore posts in the same categories: economy, politicsTags: public service trade unions, strikes, trade unions
You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.
November 24, 2009 at 8:54 pm
The “no cuts for anyone” line is difficult to credit. Surely the equitable way to go would be to compress the grade/increment scales so that the guys at the top took a substantial cut, the middle guys take a bit of a hit and the guys at the bottom very little if anything.
The main problem is State pensions – look at that double jobbing lecturer who got to keep both pensions after being dismissed, not to mention Mary Robinson who ditched her job early and is pulling in 150K on top of 36K Senator pension.
Anyone claiming multiple pensions should be only paid the largest plus a proportion of the smaller one(s), with higher concessions kicking in above 100K. When the State made an appointment to an EU position (I’m looking at you, McCreevy and Geoghegan-Quinn – the latter who will probably claim a tax free pension from Court of Auditors AND as a Commissioner), this pension should be counted as an Irish State Pension since the person could not have obtained the position otherwise.
November 24, 2009 at 9:18 pm
I disapprove of the strike too, wrong angle and bad PR. Seems daft for lecturers anyway, as teaching is only a part of what we do. Spent the day writing up a tedious research proposal!
November 24, 2009 at 10:10 pm
I can assure you that UCD was not shut, buildings were open as normal ‘though it was very quiet. At least some lectures went ahead and some people (mostly academics, curiously enough) came in. This is the last week of the semester in UCD so a bad time to be cancelling classes.
Academics can work from home anyway, up to a point, so its a bit bogus staying away. Or one could just go to Newry to do one’s shopping as apparently many strikers did.
Cormac: why not write an interesting research proposal instead?
November 25, 2009 at 8:47 am
Here in the private sector (where four fifths of employees work) yesterday was … just another day.
My take on the strike (and next week’s) is that the leadership of the trade unions are being very clever. They’re letting their members vent steam about imaginary cuts in wages and numbers (since no details have been announced yet), so that when the real announcement come in the budget they’ll be able to spin it as ‘it could have been worse comrades but for our actions’ – or something like that.
At least I hope they’re that clever. They don’t seriously expect the private sector to pay higher taxes out of diminishing incomes just to keep them in the (modestly adjusted) style they’ve become accustomed to? Surely not.
November 25, 2009 at 12:49 pm
It would be nice if all of those in the private sector who are NOT suffering diminishing incomes or taking pay cuts (about 70% according to recent Irish Times survey) made some contribution to solving the country’s problems too.
November 26, 2009 at 10:40 am
As a teacher I supported the strike. However, for my colleagues and I the issue was one of fairness in the distribution of the burden of bringing our economy under control.
With the headlining of €1.3 Bn in cuts to public sector wages, a flag seems to have been raised of how much to cut from public sector pay. No corresponding mention is made of increasing tax or looking to other sectors to help the national budget. In fact, if I remember correctly, Minister Linehan said no new taxes (apart from carbon). However, the same minister is doing a very nice job of scare-mongering. (A 63% tax to maintain public sector pay? – Perhaps he’s out to divide and conquer.)
Many teachers would not be striking if they felt that the burden of sorting out the finances was spread more evenly. Many of us look at the pension levy in addition to non-payment of previously agreed increments and see a 10% cut in pay. This is in addition to cuts budgets in our schools/hospitals/offices – all of which have a real affect on our working conditions.